Tunisia vs. Japan - Exact Score

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Tunisia’s meeting with Japan at the World Cup is priced as a low-probability exact-score event, with the market implying only a 2% chance that the final result lands on the listed scoreline. That is consistent with exact-score markets generally being thin-tail outcomes: even when a side is favoured in a match result or totals market, any one specific score can still sit in the low single digits because there are many plausible outcomes and the settlement excludes extra time and penalties.[2]

The recent head-to-head record points to Japan as the stronger side on balance, with three wins in four meetings and Tunisia’s lone victory coming earlier in the series; the most recent clash ended 2-0 to Japan in 2023.[1][7] Reuters also noted on 19 June that Japan drew 2-2 with the Netherlands in their opener, while Tunisia lost 5-1 to Sweden, a useful live-input for models that ingest form, goal environment, and team-level volatility before updating exact-score probabilities.[3] In a programmable workflow, that means watching pre-match price drift on the win/draw market and the over/under first, then mapping those moves into a scoreline ladder rather than treating the exact-score contract in isolation.

For traders using apps, bots, or conditional orders, the key catalysts are the confirmed starting line-ups, any injury or rotation news, and whether the match context changes because of group-stage incentives. FIFA’s match-centre listing and Reuters’ reporting both matter here because schedule certainty and team selection can move the distribution of low-scoring outcomes quickly, especially if one side is expected to protect a point or chase goal difference.[3][6] If the market updates near kick-off, exact-score exposure is usually most sensitive to late lineup changes, whereas early-session moves are more likely to reflect broader tournament form and market-wide pricing of the total-goals range.[2][6]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Tunisia vs. Japan - Exact Score across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at Polymarket App UK — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket App UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket App UK?

Zero. Polymarket App UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket App UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.