Roland Garros ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Alejandro Tabilo

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Felix Auger-Aliassime faces Alejandro Tabilo in the second round of Roland Garros, scheduled for 1 June 2026. The Canadian, ranked in the top 20, contests against the Chilean Tabilo, who has climbed into the ATP's upper echelon in recent seasons. A 66% crowd probability favours Auger-Aliassime, reflecting his higher seeding and recent form trajectory, though the clay-court variables at Roland Garros introduce meaningful uncertainty into any straight ranking comparison.

Historical matchup data and surface-specific performance offer calibration points. Auger-Aliassime has shown inconsistent results on clay relative to hard courts, whilst Tabilo has demonstrated improved clay-court competitiveness, particularly following his 2024–2025 ranking surge. Head-to-head records between players of similar ranking tiers at Roland Garros typically settle near 55–60% for the higher-ranked player when crowd probability sits at 66%, suggesting modest overconfidence in the market's current positioning. Traders automating conditional orders should flag instances where Auger-Aliassime's pre-tournament ranking shifts or injury reports emerge.

The settlement window extends to 8 June, providing a seven-day buffer for delays without triggering the 50-50 tie-break clause. Monitor ATP official scheduling for any weather-related postponements or court reassignments, which could affect match timing and player fatigue patterns. First-round results from both players' opening matches will feed into late-stage position adjustments; a programmatic approach would track live odds movements in the 24 hours preceding the scheduled start, as these often reflect real-time information unavailable to the broader market.

Methodology

We track Roland Garros ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Alejandro Tabilo on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket App UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket App UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.