Plovdiv: Tommaso Compagnucci vs Maxim Mrva

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Tommaso Compagnucci and Maxim Mrva are due to meet in the Plovdiv Challenger first round, and the market is effectively a binary on who advances rather than a long-dated event with much settlement ambiguity. The current 100% yes price implies the venue and scheduling logic have already been treated as highly certain by the crowd, so a programmatic trader would usually focus less on direction and more on execution risk: whether the fixture is officially started, whether it completes, and whether any postponement pushes resolution into the market’s 7-day fallback window.[1][5][6]

Comparable pre-match pricing leans towards Mrva, with Tennis Tonic listing him as the pick and initial odds around 1.333 against 2.96 for Compagnucci, while ATP records show no prior head-to-head on the tour for this pairing.[1][7] That combination matters for automation because there is no established matchup history to anchor a model, so any script, bot, or conditional order flow is usually built around market odds, draw position, and live status rather than historical rivalry data. TennisLive and Sofascore also place the match in the Plovdiv draw and show it as scheduled on 22 June, which is the key reference point for settlement if the start time slips but the contest still goes ahead.[2][6]

The main catalysts to watch are official order-of-play updates, whether the match is moved on court due to earlier-round overruns, and any late withdrawal or retirement update from the tournament feed. FanDuel’s listing also shows a slightly different local start time, underlining why traders often cross-check app feeds before placing copy trades or setting automation around a “started/not started” rule.[5] If the match is delayed but played within the settlement window, the market should still resolve to the advancing player; if it is never played or drifts beyond seven days without a winner, the fallback is 50-50.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Plovdiv: Tommaso Compagnucci vs Maxim Mrva on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket App UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.